I just spoke to a reader who's frustrated -- completely understandably -- that she's switched to the new digital converter box for over-the-air television, but she can't find programming listings for the new extended channels in a print source.
It's an unsolvable problem, to my mind. Printed schedules have a built-in barrier: Space on the printed page. It's no secret that advertisers haven't been interested in supporting a printed guide in these days of cable boxes with on-screen programming guides and Internet sources like
"These TV stations are not filling the needs of the public," said the caller. "I don't really blame you at The Star, because you aren't the TV stations, and I know it would cost a lot for something that not that very many people want. It's a no-win, I think, isn't it?"
I think she's largely right. TV Guide magazine gave up on comprehensive listings several years ago, recognizing the two-pronged competition of greatly expanded programming and electronic, interactive guides. Add to that the fact that a lot of broadcast stations are adding in extra digital channels -- that's not something that omnibus print guides are going to be able to adapt to, I don't think. There's simply too much competition now.

Same-sex marriage announcement policy
I just learned of this yesterday, and am very pleased the Star took this step. Now if we can just get that anti-gay abomination in the State constitution deep-sixed.....
I'm often a critic of the Star
I'm often a critic of the Star. I'd like to think it's mostly because I depend upon it and value it.
I'm quick to criticize. This time, let me salute the Star for the policy change.