A caller this morning wanted to express her disappointment with the past two days' front pages in the print edition. In part:
I don't know why The Star's editors feel the need to use the front page with not just one, but two days' worth of articles about the Chiefs. There's a whole sports section in there, so why don't they use that and keep the front page for the real news?
That's a point of view I expected to hear, frankly, as it's an evergreen among the people contacting me. It's also an interesting dichotomy, because stories about the Chiefs always get a lot of readership both in print and online. As one editor at the morning critique noted, Kansas City loves to hate the Chiefs when they're doing badly -- and the opposite is true when they're on a winning streak.
Reader opinions on what a general-interest publication such as The Star should focus on are always all over the map, so I know not everyone will agree that this Chiefs coverage was over the top. But I understand those who do.

Chiefs
The Chiefs got a front page story when they took the lead briefly and for the first time this season, although they lost the game. The Star will likely break out the MAN ON MOON type size for the front page when they get another win.